We’ve got a very simple page up for the Feminist Open Source Group. Excited to see where this heads.
Content and code licensing is a bit of a minefield.
The first thing to remember is that in the UK and USA at least, all creative works are automatically protected by copyright from the moment they are made. The creator retains exclusive rights to their work, and nobody can share, copy, or use the work without the creator’s direct permission unless they are sharing it in fair use (critique, comment, parody, etc.). This is the reasoning behind the classic “all rights reserved” statement you often see in relation to a creative work.
But it is foolish to believe that “all rights reserved” will always be respected for content online. Tumblr and other platforms have made it so effortless to share others’ work that the public perception of copyright is seriously warped. Creators are very welcome to reserve their rights to all of their work but if they’re releasing it online under such terms, they should be prepared for a lot of violations.
The nature of the Internet created a need for less restrictive copyright licenses, and a whole host of open, free, and commons licenses have filled the void. This is my experience navigating the space for my own work including some of the resources I’ve used, the licenses I have chosen, and my reasoning.
This is super delayed! I typed up my rough notes right after MozFest finished in October but never pressed publish. Voila.
MozFest is 10 years old! This was their last year at Ravensbourne in London. Sad, but I’m excited to see where it heads next.
This is a haphazard brain-dump of everything I want to remember and follow up on, a lot of questions for future consideration and resources that I need to explore. See also Common Knowledge’s notes from MozFest written by Gemma Copeland.
Been a busy few days with Redecentralize on Friday followed by MozFest over the weekend. Redecentralize was a one-day unconference at 4th Floor Studios in Whitechapel. The event was expertly organised by Ira Bolychevsky and her crack team.
It was a day of thought-provoking conversations and notebook scribbling. This is an attempt to decode the scribbles, make some follow-up plans, and to generally summarise the day from my perspective. There was a lot going on so I can’t cover it all, but I’m going to keep an eye out for other people’s notes via the Redecentralize newsletter.
\ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \\ \\\\\ \\\ \\\ \\\ \ \ \\ \ \\\ \ \\ \ \\ \\\ \ \\ \\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\ \\\\ \\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\ \\\ \\\ \\\\\\\\ \\ \\\ \\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\\ \ \\\ \ \ \\\ \\\ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
An “integrated platform for creating high-fidelity web archives while browsing, sharing, and disseminating archived content.”
See notes and further research prompts below in relation to yesterday’s 24 Pull Requests event. It was organised by Codebar, Ladies Who Code, and Your First PR, sponsored by Gitter, Shutl, and Twitter. I left Twitter HQ with my brain fizzing, always a good thing.
Surfing w/ coffee #2. Order of exploration:
Google search “web worker” paper.js jerky (trying to sort out animation+ajax issues) → Paper.js issue #634 “Allow using paperjs without canvas” → Paper.js issue #561 “Add Font and Glyph types from plumin.js” (↓B) → Plumin.js (↓C) → Louis-Rémi Babé @louis_remi → Surge, static web publishing
Opentype.js → Frederik De Bleser (↓D) → NodeBox, tools for generative design
Yannick Mathey @_____________y → USA, limited edition typographic print
Overtone, collaborative programmable music → Meta-eX, “Live coding. Live synths. Live music.”
See previous surf sesh.